|
Nov. 2, 2011—Schalmont is headed back to court for the third
time in a decade over tax certiorari claims filed by General
Electric.
The multinational company is challenging property value tax
assessments in the Town of Rotterdam over a five year period
beginning in 2007. If the court rules in their favor, Schalmont
will be legally required to refund nearly $13 million in tax
payments.
The Town of Rotterdam and Schenectady County will also be
required to make refunds.
Even though the back payment of taxes is usually a one-time
expense, large reductions in property tax assessments have a
permanent impact. Lowered assessments reduce the district’s tax
base, which results in all taxpayers having to make up the
difference in the next school year’s tax levy.
“This could not have come at a worse time,” said Superintendent
Dr. Valerie Kelsey. “This has the potential to drastically
impact our schools and educational program.”
Last year, the school board made nearly $2 million in budget
reductions, which were achieved through a combination of school
closures and personnel reductions affecting 24 full-time
equivalent teaching, support staff and administrative positions.
This came after the third consecutive year of reduced state aid
for education. In addition,
state leaders enacted a law this summer that places new
restrictions on how school districts may increase their tax
levies.
Tax certioraris are yet another factor influencing the school
board’s annual budget proposal.
Although the legal proceedings are currently in the beginning
stages, this particular case is expected to be resolved during
the 2012-13 school year. Schenectady County Supreme Court Judge
Reilly recently set a series of deadlines throughout the 2011-12
school year with the goal of establishing a trial date next
summer.
“We hope the Town of Rotterdam comes to a resolution that will
not place too much of a burden on the district’s taxpayers or
threaten the quality of our educational program,” said Kelsey.
Planning ahead
General Electric has filed a number of tax certiorari claims
against the district in recent years. Per court order, the
district refunded $1.1 million to GE in 2008 and approximately
$11.6 million in 2002, which it continues to pay off through
debt service.
Tax certiorari cases can go on for years, so each year the
district puts money in a Tax Certiorari Reserve Fund in
preparation for a possible verdict against the district. The
fund was established after the case in 2002.
One benefit of this strategy is that it lowers the amount of
money that the district could potentially have to borrow—and pay
interest on—to cover any future settlements. There is not
currently enough money in the account to cover the full amount
of this claim. To meet its certiorari obligation, the district
would have to make up the difference by borrowing money, which,
when bonded, would ultimately result in program cuts because of
the new property tax cap legislation.
Stay tuned to the district website and other communications as
more information becomes available.
[News
Archives]
|